What is the difference
between the language of women’s magazines and girl’s magazines?
The communication accommodation
theory by Howard Giles shows that when people speak, they adjust what is said
or how it is said depending on who they are addressing and what context and
situation they are addressing them in. I am aware that this undeniably happens
with adults and very young children, but I would be interested to see if this
applies with a much smaller age gap and if the difference is so distinct. This
is why I have chosen to investigate difference that magazine editors use in
their letters to the audience in the top 3 women’s magazines and the top 3
girls magazines to see if that theory applies in this area. Along with the
communication accommodation theory, I will be looking at some particular
frameworks – discourse structure, lexis and grammar. My hypothesis, based on
the theory, is that the two editors letters will be very divergent, especially the
grammar and even though essentially they are both aiming to do the same job of
addressing the reader, it will be done in two very different ways simply
because of the age of their audience. This investigation interests me because
when I was younger I used to really enjoy reading the types of magazines I am
using which are aimed at younger girls, and now I really enjoy the magazines
aimed at young women, so seeing how distinct the differences are will be
interesting. The theory, which states that we tend to imitate not only speech
but also behaviour habits of those who we are interacting with, appeals to me
because I think that it will be correct in the case of my investigation, so it
was easy to come up with an interesting hypothesis. Although this theory is related to speech, it
will be interesting to see if the same applies for written texts too.